未加星标

js: Handle Errors in Ramda Pipelines with tryCatch

字体大小 | |
[前端(javascript) 所属分类 前端(javascript) | 发布者 店小二05 | 时间 2017 | 作者 红领巾 ] 0人收藏点击收藏
Handle Errors in Ramda Pipelines with tryCatch

2:32 javascript lesson byAndrew Van Slaars

Handling your logic with composable functions makes your code declarative, leading to code that's easy to read and easy to test. Breaking that up to wrap some risky function in a try/catch block introduces imperative code and makes it harder to maintain that declarative approach. With Ramda's tryCatch function, you can handle errors right in the middle of a composition and leave your code clean and functional. We'll also see how you can use propOr to avoid common "cannot find X of undefined" errors.

Share this lesson: Facebook Twitter Google+

Get the Code Now

click to level up

Comment Guidelines

Member comments are a way for PRO Members to communicate, interact, and ask questions about a lesson.

Commenting Guidelines

Here are some basic guidelines for commenting on egghead.io.

Be on-topic

Comments are for discussing a lesson. If you're having a general issue with the website functionality, please contactclick here.

Avoid meta-discussion

Is your comment resembles:

This was great! This was horrible! I didn't like this because it didn't match my skill level. +1

It will likely be deleted as "meta".

Code problem?

Should be accompanied by code! JSFiddle, Plunker, CodePen, etc all provide a way to share code and discuss it in context.

Details and Context

Vague question? Vague answer. Any details and context you can provide will lure more interesting answers!

egghead.io comment guidelines

egghead.io 11 minutes ago

Handling your logic with composable functions makes your code declarative, leading to code that's easy to read and easy to test. Breaking that up to wrap some risky function in a try/catch block introduces imperative code and makes it harder to maintain that declarative approach. With Ramda's tryCatch function, you can handle errors right in the middle of a composition and leave your code clean and functional. We'll also see how you can use propOr to avoid common "cannot find X of undefined" errors.

We've included the Ramda library, created a person object with a name property, and I have some code that gets the name property and logs it out. Now if I jump to the terminal and run this, we'll see that our name property gets logged out, and everything's working as expected.

Now let's say I want to use this in a pipeline. I'm going to define a new function that I'll call getUpperName, and I'm going to set this equal a call to R.pipe, and we're going to pipe our getName function into R.toUpper, and then I want to change my result to be a call to getUpperName.

I'll save that, I'll switch over to the terminal, run it, and we should get our name in all caps.

We have everything working as expected, we get the name property off of our person, we pass it to upper, and we get a result. But what if we ended up with some undefined value getting passed into our getUpperName? If I run this again, we're going to get a type error, because the property name can't be found on undefined.

We could pull getName out of the pipeline, wrap it in a try catch and handle the potential error that way, or we can use Ramda's tryCatch function. For that I'll come up here to getName, and I'm going to put a call to R.tryCatch, passing it R.prop as the first argument.

The second argument is also going to be a function, and this is a function we want to run in the case of an error. What we can do here, is we can say R.always, and we can return a default value that'll then get piped into toUpper.

I can save this, jump back into the terminal, run this, and this time I'll get back that default value and we'll see that it's been piped through toUpper. Of course, if I come back down here and replace this undefined with an object that has our name property, and run this again, we'll see that it works as expected when there's no error.

I should point out that I used R.prop here to demonstrate how tryCatch works, but since this type of error is pretty common, there is a convenience method to do this very thing already included in Ramda.

I can come up here, and I'm just going t comment this out, and I'm going to redefine getName. This time I'm going to use prop or, and I'm going to provide our default value first, followed by the property I'd like to get. I'll save this, switch back into the terminal, run it, and we'll see that we still get our name piped through toUpper, but if I come back in here and I replace person with undefined, we'll get our default value.

本文前端(javascript)相关术语:javascript是什么意思 javascript下载 javascript权威指南 javascript基础教程 javascript 正则表达式 javascript设计模式 javascript高级程序设计 精通javascript javascript教程

主题: JavaScriptJavaFacebookTwitter
分页:12
转载请注明
本文标题:js: Handle Errors in Ramda Pipelines with tryCatch
本站链接:http://www.codesec.net/view/534954.html
分享请点击:


1.凡CodeSecTeam转载的文章,均出自其它媒体或其他官网介绍,目的在于传递更多的信息,并不代表本站赞同其观点和其真实性负责;
2.转载的文章仅代表原创作者观点,与本站无关。其原创性以及文中陈述文字和内容未经本站证实,本站对该文以及其中全部或者部分内容、文字的真实性、完整性、及时性,不作出任何保证或承若;
3.如本站转载稿涉及版权等问题,请作者及时联系本站,我们会及时处理。
登录后可拥有收藏文章、关注作者等权限...
技术大类 技术大类 | 前端(javascript) | 评论(0) | 阅读(15)