The Curse of Windows Server & Windows Server 2016 Salvation

字体大小 | |
[系统(windows) 所属分类 系统(windows) | 发布者 店小二03 | 时间 2016 | 作者 红领巾 ] 0人收藏点击收藏

Over the last year I’ve worked with Home Depot , specifically the Quote Center Group, strive forward toward a better future. Yeah, that sounds a bit campy, but seriously. I started with three core objectives, which I wrote about previously .

CommunityContributions SiteReliability TalentRecon

I’ve been able to help with each of those things over the last year, with more progress being made on some than others. Right now, I want to delve a bit into the adventure of site reliability at Quote Center. First off, I had the honor of being first guard for Quote Center in the realm of site reliability. I had a lot to do just to set some groundwork on what that position really meant. In addition to the other two roles , err, priorities , it was like taking a job that would have three roles rolled into one. For this article though, I’m going to write about specifically the site reliability and what I did to get some practice and culture around the notion of site reliability at QuoteCenter.

The first thing, was simply to write out some ideas about what this would involve. Here are a few of my original questions that I scribbled on thematter.

Servers/Instances - Need to figure out where and what servers are magical black magic servers versus fully automated instances? Where be thegoodies? Networking - What’s where and who’s doingthis? Monitoring - What do we know exists, where, and how are we alerted when something goes down? How many things are there? How many could godown? How does site reliability measure up versus systems admin, network opes, or what not? Who sayswhat?

I was working entirely from a blank slate, it appeared the first step would be to get a better definition of what exactly this should cover. One thing I did do was read up on what the notion of Site Reliability Engineer was. I wanted to have a good industry definition of the role. That led to a quick set of resources via Google. Google seems to be the creator of said position, whether they are or not doesn’t matter, because the material they have on the role is excellent. To paraphrase a summary, what an SRE is.

An SRE is basically a software engineer that is responsible for designing operations functions. This includes interacting with production environments, automation, high availability improvements, monitoring, and more. All approached from a programmatic perspective versus the more traditional notion of hands on systems administration or network administration. Other terms most commonly associated with and responsibilities of SREs include; availability, latency, performance, efficiency, change management, monitoring, emergency response, and capacityplanning.

As I dove into this work, amid all the other priorities, I was spending about ~15-20 hours a week on the efforts under this priority (or role). This was ok to get things off the ground. Here are a few other key things I put together within the first 6months.

We needed action ASAP to modernize and build on modern cloud infrastructure. I went through working with various partners in the organization to insure that our decisions would work with, or align with, or utilize software, services, and solutions that would jive with corporate. Even though I’d started down the route with Amazon Web Services (AWS), Home Depot made a higher level decision to move forward with Google Cloud Platform . This was an easy switch to make, because I’d also started a trial with various HashiCorp tools (Atlas, Terraform, and Packer specifically) that made it a breeze to swap out anything alreadydone. The next thing was to get some practices put into place to handle change management of infrastructure. I started working on this in the subsequent 3 months but made very little movement forward. This was because my other priorities took precedence during this time - the Talent Recon & Community Contributions priorities. During this time I worked with Troy Howard ( @thoward37 ) to put on two conferences we’d co-founded: . NET Fringe 2016 and Node PDX 2016 . However, even in spite of all those work, I was able to implement another major HashiCorp Server with Atlas. This helped to start shaping our workflow in a tremendousway.

This was great, and in that first 6 months I was able to get a lot of traction on those efforts. Then the windows Server battlestarted…

The Windows ServerNightmares

More than a few things we wanted to get deployed using container technology. But because of the limitations of Windows Server around its complete lack of container capabilities and the limited support of drivers within . NET , our container hopes were dashed for the time being. Even with this in our way of moving forward with containers, we knew it would eventually be the future. So what did we do in the meantime to move forward and build out our microservicesnow?

The team delved into deployment per Windows Server using a Windows Services Service based approach. In other words, the services you see when you pull up the MMC on Windows Server? Yeah, that’s what we used in the meantime to deal wtih the lack of container support. This gave our microservices the ability to get deployed with many of the feature notions we wanted and will eventually use with container tech. This however didn’t bode well for immutable deployments or clean continuous integraiton and deployment to Windows Server, and we continued to look forward to a container option in the near future withexcitement.

Yay Windows Server 2016 to theRescue!

Then, enter Windows Server 2016. The news that Windows Server 2016 would have container support was huge. We would absolutely move onto that to gain the advantage of containers if, and only if . NET Core didn’t gain enough driver and related capabilities that we didn’t get to move to linux first. You see, if we had our druthers, we’d just move to Linux and forgo Windows Server altogether. But Windows Server 2016 at least provided us a path forward if .NET Core drivers and such weren’t ported before it’srelease.

On the flip of all this, you might ask, “ why would you deploy . NET stuff to Linux instead of Windows Server?” There are a host of reasons, and the first that always pops into my mind wasn’t one of our actual concerns, but it is routinely for others. That would be pricing. Holy bajeezuz the licensing costs adds a lot to running Windows Server instances. It makes many multi- VM solutions cost prohibitive for many solutions, and hopefully containers may change this paradigm moreeffectively.

If you are in the search for server tech for microservice hosting, suffice it to say, Windows Server is NOT particularly the way to

本文系统(windows)相关术语:三级网络技术 计算机三级网络技术 网络技术基础 计算机网络技术

tags: Server,Windows,was,what,would
本文标题:The Curse of Windows Server & Windows Server 2016 Salvation

技术大类 技术大类 | 系统(windows) | 评论(0) | 阅读(184)