未加星标

The silent evolution of domain names

字体大小 | |
[开发(php) 所属分类 开发(php) | 发布者 店小二04 | 时间 2016 | 作者 红领巾 ] 0人收藏点击收藏

The silent evolution of domain names

Alan Dunn Crunch Network Contributor

Alan Dunn is the managing director of NameCorp and a senior digital naming expert and brand consultant.

More posts by this contributor: How new domains are building betterbrands China Is Making Domain NameHistory

How to join the network

Verisign recently reported that the number of registered dot-com domain names exceeded 128 million for the first time. With a wholesale price of $7.85 each, this means $1,004,800 in annual fees, and that’s before factoring in reseller prices, country code domains and alternative extensions to measure the domain-name industry as a whole.

The internet has come a long way since the first domain name, Symbolics.com, was registered in 1985. Even longer when you consider it was only 1994 when Joshua Quittner (a WIRED writer at the time) contacted McDonald’s to see if they were interested in registering mcdonalds.com, and, well, got nowhere.

The state of the domain-name industry has vastly changed. Almost everyone with a business online has tried to register a dot-com domain name ― only to find their first and best choice was gone. Most great domains were grabbed years ago by investors like Kevin Ham (CNN dubbed him, “ The man who owns the Internet ”). Even Lana Del Ray’s father is an iconic domain-name investor, and members of a Middle Eastern royal family own one of the largest portfolios in the world.

It wasn’t just people buying domain names over these two decades, either. Companies like Hearst, AOL, CBS, Salesforce and Amazon have collectively paid tens of millions of dollars for domain names; with many of them still not in use.

More recently, GoDaddy spent more than$100 million acquiring portfolios of premium domain names from private owners.

An industry that is finally maturing

What was once an industry comprised mainly of individual investors and service providers is now attracting corporate money like never before.

Industry giants have hundreds of millions for auctions and infrastructure. Big brands like Amazon, Google, Verisign and WordPress are investing heavily to own and operate entire domain-name extensions. Even company-branded extensions are now going live. Barclay’s is already using home.barclays , and new domain-name extensions for both BMW ( .bmw ) and Travelers ( .trv ) have been delegated.

One may even say it’s a natural evolution of media, where brands finally want to own the channel versus renting a space.

Will this evolution in naming work?

On the surface, it may sound crazy. After all, how many people will buy a .blog or .app domain name? How many domain names do people or companies really need? These sound like fair questions, right?

The thing is, domain names are not a zero-sum industry. Very few people believe or can make any solid case that dot-com will lose its majority status (myself included). However, success is not always defined by millions of registrations. and very profitable models exist when you own a registry.

Think about it. A low-cost, high-profit product, with cheap infrastructure, recurring revenue models, possibilities for scale, global reach and more. In a world where technology leads venture capital investment, and a 10 percent ROI will win you Wall Street rewards, owning a domain-name extension may not be one of the craziest investments around.

How big Is the market, really?

No one knows for sure. But it’s big.

Millions of new domains have already been registered, for a variety of different reasons. Some companies use them as complementary domains to an existing brand (Slack is using slack.help for support); others use them as a primary URL; some see a marketing purpose, others have defensive reasons.

Many sales are also at premium prices. DomainNameWire reported that Hanes spent $30,000 to acquire T-Shirts.store (yes, with the hyphen), Visual Dynamics purchased 3D.software for six figures and Autism.rocks fetched $100,000 .

Owning a domain-name extension may not be one of the craziest investments around.

At an individual level, it becomes even more plausible that many of these new extensions can grow. There are thousands of people called Joe, yet there is only one joe.com ― if you don’t have a pocketbook the size of Manhattan, then you probably will never have a chance to own joe.com . However, you can choose from joe.live, joe.social, joe.link and more. The concept of using these new domain-name extensions for personal use has never been more apparent, especially when relevant extensions provide an opportunity to brand ourselves in a way .com never did.

It’s not even just about use. Some of these domain-name extensions have become more like commodities, traded between investors, rather than having a traditional use. According to a CNBC interview, Sedo estimates that 54 percent of these new domain names are owned by Chinese registrants ― a market that already owns many of the world’s best two- and three-letter dot-com domains.

Not everybody needs another website, but the numbers speak, and they say lots of people can use another domain name.

The big league

It’s not uncommon to spend well over $100,000 for a premium domain name. However, buying an extension is a whole other league ― a league in which brands have only been too happy to play.

Related Articles CloudFlare's New Domain Registry Protects Site Owners From Domain H

本文开发(php)相关术语:php代码审计工具 php开发工程师 移动开发者大会 移动互联网开发 web开发工程师 软件开发流程 软件开发工程师

主题: SlackCBSWordBMWCNBC
分页:12
转载请注明
本文标题:The silent evolution of domain names
本站链接:http://www.codesec.net/view/481253.html
分享请点击:


1.凡CodeSecTeam转载的文章,均出自其它媒体或其他官网介绍,目的在于传递更多的信息,并不代表本站赞同其观点和其真实性负责;
2.转载的文章仅代表原创作者观点,与本站无关。其原创性以及文中陈述文字和内容未经本站证实,本站对该文以及其中全部或者部分内容、文字的真实性、完整性、及时性,不作出任何保证或承若;
3.如本站转载稿涉及版权等问题,请作者及时联系本站,我们会及时处理。
登录后可拥有收藏文章、关注作者等权限...
技术大类 技术大类 | 开发(php) | 评论(0) | 阅读(35)