未加星标

PubmedCommons API

字体大小 | |
[前端(javascript) 所属分类 前端(javascript) | 发布者 店小二04 | 时间 2016 | 作者 红领巾 ] 0人收藏点击收藏

The announcements are out, Pubmed is introducing a commenting system pubmedcommons , theoretically providing a single location for true post-publication peer review. This is a really good idea, as NCBI is likely to be around for a lot longer than a given publisher, and the requirement for all NIH funded research to be deposited into Pubmed.

There are some detractors, and they may have some valid points link . However, the alternative, pubpeer , I had not heard about. F1000 puts the comments in one location, in a way that is no better than a single publisher site.

What would truly let the pubmedcommons proliferate would be if it became the equivalent ofdisqus, but for scientific articles. For those who don't know, disqus is essentially a remote commenting platform that provides commenting on other websites. For example,my blog is a static site, and comments are provided by disqus. This is enabled with an account on disqus and a javascript snippet on my website.

It would be neat if pubmedcommons became a similar platform for scientific articles, with a little bit more flexibility. i.e. someone would be able to include some javascript, with relevant pubmed IDs, and the comments for that article would be displayed, and others would be able to make comments on that site.

Let me illustrate with an example.

Imagine I publish a paper in PLOS One (or any other journal, for that matter). Upon acceptance, the paper also gets a pubmed id. This instantly creates a forum for comments using pubmedcommons. In addition, PLOS One adds a little bit of javascript to their page for the paper that enables the same commenting system. Therefore, any comments made on the paper at pubmed or PLOS One appear in both places (maybe with a tag for where they originated?). In addition, I post a copy of the paper on my own blog, and add the same javascript, and readers will see the comments made at pubmed, PLOS One, and can comment on the paper on my own blog. In addition, someone else could do the same to display the comments on their own site, etc, etc.

I think the above example might have the potential to revolutionize post-pub peer review, because the actual comments are hosted in a central location, but are accessible in many different locations where the publication might exist.

Now, it could still go awry. They could take too long to open things up, they might make the policies regarding comments too restrictive, they may police the comments too heavily, etc, etc. But

Tagged in:openscience, pubmedcommons

Posted on 2013-10-22

本文前端(javascript)相关术语:javascript是什么意思 javascript下载 javascript权威指南 javascript基础教程 javascript 正则表达式 javascript设计模式 javascript高级程序设计 精通javascript javascript教程

分页:12
转载请注明
本文标题:PubmedCommons API
本站链接:http://www.codesec.net/view/480712.html
分享请点击:


1.凡CodeSecTeam转载的文章,均出自其它媒体或其他官网介绍,目的在于传递更多的信息,并不代表本站赞同其观点和其真实性负责;
2.转载的文章仅代表原创作者观点,与本站无关。其原创性以及文中陈述文字和内容未经本站证实,本站对该文以及其中全部或者部分内容、文字的真实性、完整性、及时性,不作出任何保证或承若;
3.如本站转载稿涉及版权等问题,请作者及时联系本站,我们会及时处理。
登录后可拥有收藏文章、关注作者等权限...
技术大类 技术大类 | 前端(javascript) | 评论(0) | 阅读(29)